There are countless interpretations and commentaries on the Yoga Sutras, originally compiled by Patanjali thousands of years spillo

There are countless interpretations and commentaries on the Yoga Sutras, originally compiled by Patanjali thousands of years spillo

I found Swami Satchidananda’s version puro be informative and somewhat blunt – and I mean that mediante a good way. He uses per few modern examples throughout the text onesto help improve the reader’s understanding. This book was originally published durante 1978 and the di nuovo Personally, I’ve only read 2 others before reading this version, so my point of reference may be considered narrow.

I found Swami Satchidananda’s version sicuro be informative and somewhat blunt – and I mean that con verso good way. He uses a few modern examples throughout the text to help improve the reader’s understanding. This book was originally published sopra 1978 and the examples he uses still apply (both ironic and sad).

I read one or two sutras before each yoga practice

His attempt to explain the overall concept of “never-ending consciousness” that is per key part of the spirituality of Yoga felt a bit incomplete, or at the very least, confusing. His use of the word God to symbolize said consciousness made it hard sicuro distinguish between the Christian concept of God and the yogic concept of consciousness/God/Light . etc.

Swami summarizes and skips over indivisible sutras entirely within Books 3 & 4. Notably, these are the 2 of the 4 books that most authors summarize because they have less day-to-day useful knowledge, so his choice is common.

Personally, I am very happy that I took the time preciso read this interpretation of the Yoga Sutras and I’d widely recommend it to others, especially those delving into the world of teaching Yoga. That being said, this isn’t a be-all end-all translation (giammai book is), so I implore you onesto read other Yoga Sutras commentaries as well. . more

After finally finishing it, I know I need sicuro go back esatto it and study the sutras with some intensity. There is much wisdom bestowed sopra wapa incontri app these pages, and there were many moments while reading, I gained clarity on the way I interact and respond with my environment.

Highly recommended for any devoted yoga practitioner, but also for those who are interested in asian philosophy. Although yoga is not defined by one religion, the influences of Hinduism a After finally finishing it, I know I need onesto go back sicuro it and study the sutras with some intensity. There is much wisdom bestowed in these pages, and there were many moments while reading, I gained clarity on the way I interact and respond with my environment.

If you are looking for per complete commentary on the Yoga Sutras, this is not the book for you

Highly recommended for any devoted yoga practitioner, but also for those who are interested in asian philosophy. Although yoga is not defined by one religion, the influences of Hinduism and Buddhism are apparent. I liked how Satchidananda used present day examples onesto explain the sutras and did not hesitate to incorporate science. . more

Praise be! Read on time for the upcoming teacher istruzione weekend. Well worth the read durante this context, some excellent teachings here (from 2000+ years spillo), and also some provocation – always good onesto question rather than accept with blind faith. I understand there’s another version from verso feminist perspective – I’ll search it out. Also, the expansion of final sutra of the final (4th) book reminded me of something I was told sopra Pikangikum one time, that I absolutely did not get, had to do with b Praise be! Read on time for the upcoming teacher preparazione weekend. Well worth the read mediante this context, some excellent teachings here (from 2000+ years ago), and also some provocation – always good puro question rather than accept with blind faith. I understand there’s another version from per feminist perspective – I’ll search it out. Also, the expansion of final sutra of the final (4th) book reminded me of something I was told in Pikangikum one time, that I absolutely did not get, had to do with being con per particular state, where you were not responsible for your actions. Seeing it here in another context has me rethinking, but still not yet understanding. I wish I could go back to Pik. I suppose I can. A good topic for conciliabule.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *